By Selwyn Duke
Why do today’s Democrats feel content demonizing half the population as “white supremacists” and “domestic terrorists”? Why do they embrace “woke” policies enjoying little popular support? They’re certainly not taking a page out of Dale Carnegie’s book How to Win Friends & Influence People, that’s for sure.
While part of the explanation could be political zealotry and tone deafness, some observers promulgate another theory.
Read the rest here.
By Selwyn Duke
I was on the second hour of the show. My appearance begins at 52:20.
Note: To fast-forward to my segment, you must right-click on the in-line MP3 player below and then click "Open link in new tab."
By Selwyn Duke
If a November poll is to be believed, Kamala Harris is possibly the most unpopular vice president in history. That survey, by liberal USA Today, found that only 28 percent of Americans approved of her job performance. This is close to Republican ex-vice president Dick Cheney’s low, 30 percent, despite Harris’s benefitting from a degree of positive media coverage of which Cheney could only dream.
In fairness, this poll was an outlier, and Harris’s Real Clear Politics average is higher: 38.6 percent. Yet this is still well under water. Harris’s defenders, however, have an explanation:
“Harris faces unduly high standards,” as the Associated Press put it yesterday.
Of course, to couch the message the AP wanted to send as “news,” it followed its quoted headline with “experts say.” This was under a video that ostensibly proved the AP’s point, a clip featuring one “expert”: Rutgers University associate professor of political science Kelly Dittmar. And the academic talked about Harris for a total of 74 seconds (probably about 60 seconds longer than discussion of Harris’s substance warrants).
To be clear, many other apologists would make the same case.
Read the rest here.
By Selwyn Duke
“Be fruitful and multiply.” This is essentially the message sent by tech billionaire Elon Musk, who, for not the first time, is warning of population collapse.
Issuing his statement on Twitter yesterday, Musk was alluding to the world’s long-declining birthrates and lamented, “If there aren’t enough people for Earth, then there definitely won’t be enough for Mars.”
Of course, one could wonder what Musk's concern really is, as in the past he has said the probability is high that all of humanity is living in a Matrix-like virtual-reality program. But while this notion is eccentric, to say the least, his population concerns are an actual reality demographers have spoken about for decades.
As Musk tweeted....
Read the rest here.
By Selwyn Duke
It was in 2020 already that 65 percent of doctors surveyed stated they’d prescribe hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for a loved one with COVID-19. There have also been 67 studies indicating ivermectin’s effectiveness in treating the disease, according to Gateway Pundit. Anecdotally, I personally know a physician who prescribed HCQ for both herself and her husband after they contracted the coronavirus, and I join countless other Americans in having seen ivermectin (IVM) work miraculously to mitigate COVID in people close to me. Put simply, the evidence is now overwhelming that the two medications, when used in conjunction with other therapeutics as part of a treatment protocol, cure the disease.
Despite this, IVM and HCQ have still been demonized by politicians and health officials such as Dr. Anthony Fauci, who ostensibly had no idea about the drugs’ utility in suppressing SARS-CoV-2.
Except that they did — or should have.
And according to observers such as Dr. Robert Malone, an mRNA-vaccine-technology pioneer, hundreds of thousands of people have died needlessly because of these officials’ negligence.
That our authorities should have known, and likely did, about the medications’ efficacy is revealed in government documents that investigative organization Project Veritas reports it recently uncovered.
Read the rest here.
By Selwyn Duke
It was in November already that a video emerged of a Texas man being refused COVID treatment because of his race. He was white. Around the same time, now-disgraced then-New York governor Andrew Cuomo advocated anti-white racial preferences in COVID treatment, and more recently the Empire State’s health department prioritized blacks and Hispanics over whites in the administration of life-saving monoclonal antibodies. Now Joe Biden — who was billed during the 2020 campaign as a uniter — is taking this medical racism national.
Read the rest here.
By Selwyn Duke
For the record, I’ve nothing against our friendly-fronted friends. Why, my favorite philosopher, G.K. Chesterton, reportedly weighed in at close to 400 pounds. Yet the reality is that the horizontally challenged have something in common with the “unvaccinated.”
The latter are now today’s lepers, attaining this status via refusal to accept experimental mRNA therapy agents (MTAs, a.k.a. “vaccines”) designed to prevent something they don’t prevent. In fact, many Branch COVIDians talk about making “vaccine passports” a requirement for “participation in society.”
This is already happening to an extent in Australia, the Land Down Under — COVID tyranny. For example, Australia’s Northern Territory announced new draconian lockdown restrictions last week, with the MTA-resistant especially targeted.
Never mind that Lord Fauci the Infallible and other health oracles once said, implying it was quite the mountain to climb, that a 70 to 80 percent “vaccination” rate would suffice to deliver herd immunity, and Australia now has a 91 percent rate among people over 12.
Continue reading "If Limiting the Unvaxxed is Wise, What About Limiting Fat People?" »
By Selwyn Duke
“What mighty contests rise from trivial things,” wrote Alexander Pope. This might come to mind when pondering the Novak Djokovic situation. The Serbian-born Djokovic’s racket is sport, after all, which isn’t exactly as meaningful as eliminating disease. And the current controversy surrounding him is over his refusal to receive a COVID “vaccination,” which should be a scientifically trivial matter because it doesn’t prevent disease. Yet the world’s best tennis player’s well-publicized conflict with the Australian government has taken on truly great proportions, becoming symbolic of a great lie, great persecution, and great resistance of our time.
For if a wealthy and famous athlete such as Djokovic (pronounced joke-uh-vich) can’t participate in a tennis tournament for lack of the needle, what does this bode for the little guy’s prospects for resisting medical tyranny?
Down Under for the upcoming Australian open, Djokovic is still in limbo after a Monday court victory that freed the perfectly healthy man from a coronavirus quarantine, as there’s now a claim that he might have given immigration officials false travel information. This is apparently unacceptable to COVID Ritualist governments — which wouldn’t know anything about peddling false information.
Read the rest here.
By Selwyn Duke
Forget the “novel virus.” The quest for “novel” COVID drugs and the profits they bring have been the real problem all along. So said Dr. Pierre Kory, the Wisconsin intensive care physician and lung specialist who reportedly treated hundreds of congressmen for coronavirus with a medication that’s apparently not good enough (or too good?) for the rest of us: ivermectin.
Kory made his comments this past weekend on Maria Bartiromo’s show Sunday Morning Futures, on which he appeared with Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wis.). After he remarked on how a medical establishment corrupted by money has denied Americans simple, inexpensive, life-saving medical care, host Bartiromo exclaimed, “That is disgusting! I know for a fact that hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin work to treat COVID!”
To this, Kory nodded in obvious agreement.
Read the rest here.
By Selwyn Duke
We “have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it,” infamously said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) about ObamaCare in 2010. In reality, having the public not know what’s in a bill until it’s too late is standard procedure. A prime example is reportedly in the recently passed $1.2 trillion, 2,700-page (as long as almost 10 average books) infrastructure bill: a requirement that “kill switches” be put in all new cars.
Many Americans actually support this idea. They find appealing the prospect of being able to shut down a dangerous, fleeing criminal’s car before he possibly kills innocents. And this is a good. Yet a government that can at a button’s touch save can also thus savage.
What’s more, even if you trust the state, do you trust the technology?
Read the rest here.
Recent Comments