By Selwyn Duke
Many opponents of hate-crime laws have long pointed out that they will never be applied equitably. The laws exist solely to punish members of politically-incorrect groups who commit politically-incorrect crimes. That is to say, they're not about eliminating hate — they're about targeting those the left hates.
If ever there was a case that vindicated this thesis, it's a recent unprovoked attack on a white Ohio family by a mob of black teens. Phil Trexler at Ohio.com reports:
It [the attack] came after a family night of celebrating America and freedom with a fireworks show at Firestone Stadium. [Marty] Marshall, his family and two friends were gathered outside a friend's home in South Akron.
Out of nowhere, the six were attacked by dozens of teenage boys, who shouted ''This is our world'' and ''This is a black world'' as they confronted Marshall and his family.
Despite this, Trexler tells us, "Akron police say they aren't ready to call it a hate crime or a gang initiation. But to Marty Marshall, his wife and two kids, it seems pretty clear."
Yes, it seems pretty clear to anyone with two brain cells to rub together.
Now, I don't believe in hate crime legislation and have devoted copious ink to demonstrating its Orwellian nature. But if this isn't a "hate crime," what is? What has to happen for politically-correct, thoroughly corrupt authorities to label a bias crime against whites just exactly what it is? Do the perpetrators have to sign a notarized affidavit prior to the act stating, "We hereby acknowledge that we hate white people and are committing this act of violence on that basis"?
I understand that the police are generally circumspect in what they say. But, in the least, their statement should have been something to the effect of, "We're not officially calling it a hate crime yet, but it certainly appears as if the perpetrators were motivated by bias."
Of course, chances are good, I suppose, that Akron authorities will ultimately bring hate-crime charges (assuming the thugs are caught). If they do not, however, the city's citizens ought to demand that the whole leadership of its police force be fired and replaced.
And while we're at it, let's get rid of hate-crime laws — otherwise known as "get-whitey laws" — too.
© 2009 Selwyn Duke — All Rights Reserved
The only way to revive the long lost culture of white on black racism is to legislate inequity upon race lines. Affirmative action and defining hate crimes as a one way street is a great way to kindle the fires of resentment especially in a tight job market. Such is the plan of the leftist; divide and conquer. Harmony has never been their goal; nor equality.
Posted by: Walt | July 09, 2009 at 12:43 PM
If we could get the White Men of this country to stand like the black teenagers.........hell, we might be able to do something.....
But as long as White Men are paralyzed by fear.....we will continue to get ran over....
black teenagers have more balls than White Men...
Thats sad.......thats pitiful.....thats freaking pathetic...
I have never before in my history on this earth seen where White Men cower...its embarrassing...
Notice ONE thing though, people...the ONLY way blacks can get Whites is to 'gang' them...
WHY..WHY....WHY....arent the White people doing it back to them....
I'll never understand that....
Posted by: Frank | July 12, 2009 at 07:46 AM
Let me explain it:
Animal vs. Human.
Simple distinction.
Posted by: Edward Williams | July 12, 2009 at 04:06 PM
To Frank,
Frank, myself and many others can definitely understand where you are coming from. There are two points I would make based on my life experiences. One, I believe this cowardice you talk is halfway true, there are cowards aplenty, but also much of this is expressions of civility which our civilization (whites) have become famous for. We don't act the same way in return because by and large we are a different people. I for one am grateful for that.
The second point comes from many experiences most notably when I was 13 and in middle school. I am 28 now to give you an idea of the time. When I entered middle school I was first exposed to the wonderous joy of multi culturalism in the form of a school which was about 50/50 white/non white makeup respectably. I celebrated this diversity by repeatedly getting spit on, bullied, stolen from , and all other forms of abuse. I, like so many other smaller built white kids, were terrified and often seemed defensless. Over time...the pot boiled over. Whites organized and struck back....nothing short of a race war. In was fast, brutal, and in the space of about 15 minutes...over. Whites in that school earned their respect.
As a christian who believes all life is sacred and all need to hear the testimony of jesus christ I cannot advocate violence to achieve political or social means. However, with that being said, based on the political policies of our ruling elite and the state's attitude as a whole based on race, large scale racial conflict is inevitable in the long run. I would bet my reputation on it. Whites will become tired of the disease of multi-culturalism, see Frank Ricci, and began fighting back. The charge of racism had grown dull over excessive use and is losing effect. The anger of hard working whites both here and in Europe is growing. In your lifetime..you will see the day.
Shaun
BTW- Walt, I agree with your post. However, politics doesn't stoke racism nearly as much as close proximity.
Posted by: Shaun | July 13, 2009 at 12:08 PM