Natural disasters are bad.
They’re far worse when they combine with unnatural disasters. We’re all calling
the recent Haitian earthquake devastating, but it’s more correct to say that in
Port-Au-Prince there is tremendous devastation. And there is a difference, as
more “devastating” quakes have caused less devastation in other places.
Famed
economist Walter Williams brings this to light in a recent column.
He points out that while Haiti's 7.0 quake has a death toll of more than
200,000, northern California's 1989 Loma Prieta 7.1 quake and San Francisco’s
1906, 7.8 quake — which was about eight times the intensity of Haiti’s —
claimed respectively, only 63 and 3,000 lives.
Read the rest here.
Selwyn, I don't know if this is a problem that only happens to me but when I click on the links that say "Read the rest here", only a portion of the page loads and I can't finsh reading your articles. :( Just in case it's not only me, I thought you'd like to know.
Posted by: Janice | January 24, 2010 at 01:59 AM
Don't worry Janice. You're not missing much.
Posted by: Sal | January 24, 2010 at 10:31 AM