Guest Commentary: Fabian Conservatism

By Bruce Walker

Conservatives , the overwhelming majority of Americans, are angry with the Republican Party leadership and how politics has been  played since Ronald Reagan left office.   Often Republican nominees have seemed to copy Bill Clinton’s “triangulation” or strategically placing themselves as the arbitrators between conservatives and leftists.   McCain luxuriated in fawning media coverage of his “independence” from conservatives.  George H. Bush, as soon as the Gipper was gone, promised to move us to a “Kinder, Gentler” – moderate - America.   Specter and Jeffords switched parties at critical times.  Who trusts Republican leaders?  Not serious conservatives, who have been burned so often.

The question, though, is what to do.  Many conservatives seemed to have the attitude that without a revolution now, we are doomed.  That assumes that we must transform America in the next couple of years and that we will have the opportunity to do that.  The present sorry state of our country did not begin with Obama or Clinton or even LBJ.  The cure for the plague of Leftism will come in steps.  Conservatives who want every good reform implemented now will become sad, demoralized, and bitter.  There is no need for that.  We must, instead, become Fabian Conservatives.  The left moved the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave into the Land of the Taxed and the Home of the Slave by adopting Fabian Socialism.  There is a reason today why Obama is not pushing for an absolute revolution, like Lenin or Hitler sought:  Obama practices Fabian Socialism.  He works to erode our liberties step by step.  He tries to create constituencies who may not be socialist themselves, but who will become addicted to some program in the socialist agenda.  This is what conservatives should do:  we should give clusters of Americans a new vested interest in those three pillars of conservatism:  federalism with robust states’ rights, small and limited government at all levels, and the influence of Judeo-Christian moral values in l our institutions. 

Fabian Conservatism means always moving to the right when we can and never supporting the left, but it also means that the transformation of America will come in incremental steps.  Fabian Conservatism means sometimes finding strange bedfellows (making common cause with leftists who have a particular ax to grind.)  Here is an example of that:  Vermonters have formed a secessionist ticket of state government candidates.  These folks want to withdraw from America because our nation is not Marxist enough.  Conservatives ought to believe strongly in states’ rights.  So we should agree with these radical Vermonters on this principle:  the citizens of states, rather than the majority of Americans, ought to have the right to decide how the state is governed.  States’ Rights, in fact, is an ideal agenda for conservatives selectively pulling leftists into ad hoc support for our goals.  Socialist Vermonters and conservative Utahans both have an interest in having their own citizens exercise primary policy power in their states.

Conservatives should also push hard for federal legislation with outlaws gerrymandering in congressional and in state legislative districts.  We should do this even though redistricting after the 2010 elections may slightly favor Republicans.  Why?  Gerrymandered districts have historically not only been used to keep artificial Democrat majorities in the House, but also to protect nearly all congressman – Democrat or Republican – from losing reelection.  Gerrymandered districts are part of the Incumbency Protection Plan of Washington.   States can stop gerrymandering but most have not.  What not push for an end at the federal level?

Conservatives might also want to consider expanding the allowable activities and the number of nonprofit organizations.  Why?  Well, a lot of leftist support comes from foundations and some churches and synagogues support the left as well, but all the money which those institutions spend is given voluntarily and spent independently.  Conservative religious congregations and the active conservative think tanks provide an immense amount of support for conservatism.  In additional to political and rhetorical support, if faith based social programs can supplant government social programs, then the need for government programs recedes (as well as the constituency for supporting these programs.)

Why not push, now, for a restoration of the federal income tax deduction for medical expenses?  This was effectively removed for millions of Americans when the threshold of expenses before deductions were allowed was raised to amounts above 7.5% of Adjusted Gross Income in the Tax Reform Act of 1986.  Allowing all medical expenses, including insurance, to be tax deductable would allow ordinary Americans to be able to select and to buy their own medical services with no government involvement.   Many millions of Americans would immediately and significantly benefit from this change, which would have the federal government subsidize through tax deductions privately chosen medical expenses.  Hospitals, drug companies, doctors, and many other providers would like this – there is no deduction unless medical costs are paid – and once put back in the tax code, it would be hard to take out.

These and other proposals need to create an automatic constituency which will continue to support the reform in the future.  If we had now strong federal safeguards of states’ rights, fair legislative district boundaries, a flowering of faith based solutions to social problems, and a restoration of the medical tax deduction, each reform would begin an institutional reformation of America in the direction of limited and local government and private choice in medical care – not revolutionary changes but, rather, evolutionary changes.   We, the overwhelming majority, can reclaim America, but not in one great battle or bloody revolution.  What we want, instead, is to be a powerful current of water, always moving America to the right, making some changes regularly and never permitting our changes to be lost.  We must become Fabian Conservatives.

                   © 2010 Bruce Walker — All Rights Reserved

__________________________________________________________

Bruce Walker is the author of two books:  Sinisterism: Secular Religion of the Lie and The Swastika against the Cross: The Nazi War on Christianity.

http://outskirtspress.com/swastika_against_the_cross 

 http://outskirtspress.com/Sinisterism

Comments

[Shaun]

A very well expressed sentiment by a talented author. It is hard to a good piece about politics that leaves you on a good note but I think this one does. Although I remain pessimistic about a great deal of things, including the political right of this country to nominate a real republican for the oval office, Bruce is right that we can all effect the outcome by having this "fabian conservative" mentality that works to influence where it can. BTW, aren't the Fabians an elite social order bred in England? Some of them include JFK, Keynes, damn near most of the origional Fed Reserve members.

[Philip France]

In addition to Shaun, I also appreciate Mr. Walker's article but I think that a more counter-revolutionary movement needs to take place.

I suggest an audit of all laws by Constitutional scholars with a view to repeal all laws that do violence to our Constitution.

Our United States Constitutiton is written in clear and simple, black-and-white language. Even an imbecile should be able to comprehend its meaning. The erosion of our founding document has occurred through the dastardly use of one single word: "reasonable". Imbeciles can "reason". They do so incorrectly and inchorently, but they "reason" (or at least believe that they do) nonetheless. Let us throw out this filthy word that changes the clear, black-and-white language of our Constitution into a subjective and massive gray area.

Then let us strictly adhere to the language of our Constitution. After all, this is the most obvious reason that the United States of America has been the greatest, wealthiest and most prosperous nation in all of the world's history.

[Larrry Rivera]

People bitch and moan about a Mexican standing in a hardware store parking lot looking for work. Yet, nobody complains about this puddle of Canadian drool, pedaling his slobbering reactionary nonsense all over this country.

Brucie ought to hook up his sled dogs to the time machine he bounces around in and head back to his own country in another century where he’d fit in better. That is, unless he has a domestic partner in the United States. In which case, I guess he can stay. And we all know who that would be, don’t we?