Whenever criticizing grammar and punctuation, you run the risk of being labeled punctilious. Worse still, since even many good writers involved in Internet journalism disgorge the odd typo, there’s the chance you will come to be regarded as an expert on the glass-house real estate market. Yet there’s no doubt that the much lamented decline in journalism is about style as well as substance. And, just occasionally, you encounter an example of it that demands some attention.
Such is a Channel 13 Action
News (ABC) article titled
“Las Vegas Mayor Goodman rejects Obama invitation,” a piece that is, you might
say, plagiarism proof. It brings to mind
that oft-heard journalistic advice that, put loosely, instructs one to write at
an eighth-grade level. Only, I didn’t
know it referred to the eighth grade in Mexico — when writing in English. That is to say, it’s obvious the piece was
not penned by a native English speaker.
The article is so bad that it’s
impossible to print all the errors contained therein without running afoul of Fair
Use Doctrine. So, since I don’t write
for The New York Times and my name
isn’t Zachary
Kouwe or Jayson
Blair, I’ll just say that I counted nine major mistakes (and I’m omitting much) in the 333-word piece and
will present the most glaring examples. I
won’t provide corrections, however, as these excerpts speak for
themselves. And if a reader can’t hear what
they say, I suggest that he has a future at ABC News.
First we have, “Mayor Goodman
has more important things like attend budget meetings during a major shortfall
than meet with President Barack Obama . . . .”
Next we have two typos in one
sentence: “Mayor Goodman not backing down after the president used Las Vegas
the example of where not to go . . . .”
Then we have this mangled,
convoluted head-scratcher, “Invitations Mayor Oscar Goodman respectfully or
depending on your point of view not so respectfully declines.”
And finally there is the
second-to-last line, “What do you think about Mayor Goodman rejecting to meet
with President Obama?” the closest thing to pidgin English I have ever seen from
a news outlet — and this includes foreign sources such as those in India.
Oh, I should mention that the
piece has no by-line, which saves the “writer” not only embarrassment but also
a possible visit from the INS.
How did such illiterate
scribbling make it into print? Did an
ABC reporter wheedle his landscaper into writing his news piece? Is the listing Lamestream Media so
financially strapped that they’re hiring illegal labor?
Jesting aside, it’s no stretch
to say that this is the result of America’s affirmative-action mentality. And, if you think it’s much ado about
nothing, know that it reflects a society to which standards increasingly mean
nothing. We are creating generations of
ignorant, shiftless slackers, people who are only eternally vigilant about
seeking pleasure. And think about this:
If many modern Americans cannot adequately perform even simple functions, how
can they tackle complex problems? How
can we expect them to be able to solve our budget and financial woes or create
healthy families?
We are descending, pell-mell,
toward Idiocracy. But, hey, man, like, you know, I get ABC’s
drift, you know. So what’s my
problem? Well, my bad, dude, my
bad. Yo, yes, we can!
This piece was first published at American Thinker
© 2010 Selwyn Duke — All Rights Reserved
Get real, Selwyn. The "English" sounds like that written by a good ol' American graduate of a government-run, school, probably named Jason or Jared...
Posted by: M. Oberndorf | February 22, 2010 at 06:43 AM
A couple of quotes in response to
your
very important and reasonable
complaint:
"If you can't do it with
a little, you can't do it with a lot" with a lot" - a cowboy quote by
"Kid Marley"
"In a dumbed-down world driven by the relentless demand of ratings we see international analysis and
socio-political coverage slimmed to
wafer thin."...from the About Us
page of journeymanpictures
(journeyman.tv).
The problem, as I see it, is nothing
but pure lazyness on part of too
many people who should know better.
But what are you going to do,
now that texting and e-mail
symbols have become substitutes for
'old fashioned writing'? Alvin Toffler would be proud!
Keep up the good fight.
Posted by: Joe Chernicoff | February 22, 2010 at 02:28 PM