Bowing to Public Pressure, Tax-funded Colorado Sex Camp for Kids Is CANCELED

By Selwyn Duke

It’s said that sunlight is the best disinfectant. It sure worked, too, with a Colorado abortion clinic that planned to host a free “sex-ed” summer camp that would have, among other things, taught kids about “gender” ideology and auto-eroticism.

Geared toward fifth- through eighth-graders and hosted by the Boulder Valley Health Center (BVHC), the prurient endeavor was taxpayer-funded, too. But now it has been canceled, announced organizers, due “to safety concerns.”

Commentator Todd Starnes had reported on the camp last Thursday, prior to cancellation, writing:

“We will talk about everything related to sex, bodies, sexuality, sexy feelings, media, power and justice,” read a poster promoting the event. “Some topics might include: bodies beyond the binary, feelings and how to navigate them, gender and sexuality, consent and communication, relationships, pleasure (in all sorts of ways)” and even self love.

Apparently, the citizens of Boulder are perfectly okay with grown adults sitting around a campfire talking to fifth graders about “sexy feelings” and singing Chappell Roan songs.

Well, apparently not — not all of them, anyway, and certainly not the wider society. As Libs of TikTok, the first to break the incredible story, tweeted in an update:

Lol look at CU Boulders marketing brochure and compare it to the cancelation message. Wow, CU Boulder is lost. Which administrator wanted our tax dollars spent like this? Look: pic.twitter.com/RVMzJyKpcJ

— Swamp Fox (@ChrisK523429) April 27, 2025

This again illustrates social pressure’s power. The BVHC must have received, after all, withering criticism (and threats, too, no doubt) after the sex camp was exposed. Its cancellation didn’t take long, either. Below is Libs of TikTok’s initial tweet breaking the story, posted just last Wednesday.

🚨 FEDERALLY FUNDED MASTURBATION LESSONS FOR CHILDREN

Boulder Valley Health Center, an abortion clinic in Colorado, is hosting a free "Sex Ed Summer Camp" for children, which will teach them about gender ideology and "everything related to sex, bodies, sexuality, sexy feelings,… pic.twitter.com/IuXqIAVYj0

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) April 23, 2025

A Battle Won — but the War Still Rages

Of course, BVHC event’s nixing is the kind of “cancel culture” most Americans can get behind. Yet it’s a mistake believing that, as many triumphantly proclaimed after the 2024 MAGA election victory, “Woke is dead.” Election wins are the deck chairs being moved right or left on the ship of state.

Cultural movements are the direction in which the ship is actually drifting, right or left.

The sexual devolutionaries aren’t even close to crying “uncle!” as a safe word, either. Consider, for example, that Drag Queen Story Hour (DQSH) events are still being hosted. These are, of course, activities in which men dressed as women read stories to very young children. (Not all that long ago, really, such “performers” were found only in seedy nightclubs.)

For example, a DQSH event is scheduled for Saturday, May 3 at the ACME Screening Room in Lambertville, New Jersey. And a “Drag Story Hour” “School’s Out Fundraiser!” is being held in Arizona May 24. The organizers still haven’t announced the location, likely aiming to frustrate protest efforts.

Baked Into the System

Unfortunately, the aforementioned is just the iceberg’s tip, too. Just consider, for instance, the following City Journal story from earlier this month:

For nearly a decade, the federal government has funded a nonprofit group that works to educate minors about sex toys, while discouraging them from telling their parents about it. The Center for Innovative Public Health Research has received more than $22 million in federal money since 2016. According to its website, the group creates “health education programs” that “promote positive human development.” But the content of those programs — and the comments of the organization’s CEO, Michele Ybarra — suggest that CIPHR’s “human development” goals are anything but positive.

Take Girl2Girl. Launched in 2017 and run by CIPHR, it’s a federally funded “sex ed program just for teen girls who are into girls.” Its website allows users — mostly between ages 14 and 16, according to one study — to sign up for “daily text messages . . . about things like sex with girls and boys.”

The content of those messages raises serious concerns. According to the program’s website, Girl2Girl texts minors about “lube and sex toys,” “the different types of sex and ways to increase pleasure,” and “what it’s like growing up as [a] teen girl who is into girls.” The site also encourages participants to make their “own decision[s] about whether to take part in the research” — and explicitly advises them not to tell their parents if they’d prefer not to.

This lends credence, do note, to the common accusation that these sexual devolutionaries are “groomers.” After all, urging kids to keep activities secret from parents is common among child predators.

A Dark and Sordid History

The reality, though, is that this is nothing new. In fact, “sex education” itself was born of perversion — and of the long-dead groomers practicing it.

That is, few people know that the whole idea of school sex education in the United States (and probably elsewhere) can be traced back to entomologist-turned self-proclaimed sex expert Alfred Kinsey. Also not widely known is that his “research” was wholly fraudulent.

Even more to the point here, though, is something obscured by flattering Hollywood portrayals of the researcher. To wit:

Kinsey was a pervert obsessed with children and had a working relationship with pedophiles.

In fact, his institute was essentially an organized pedophile organization that used science as a cover for its dark passions. This is not opinion, mind you. Kinsey actually recorded “data” on the “sexual responses” of children — including infants. And how were they induced?

Kinsey right-hand man Paul Gebhard once explained, actually admitting that it was accomplished by way of “oral and manual techniques.” You can learn this whole dark history in my 2009 essay, “According to Kinsey, Deviancy Is the New Normal.”

If any of this makes you question sex education’s value, and why it should even exist, it should. Note here that in the 1940s, prior to sex ed’s inception, America’s out-of-wedlock birthrate was four percent.

Today it’s 40 percent.

In other words, its effectiveness at managing passion’s negative outcomes mirrors communism’s effectiveness at managing economies. And it’s high time that the Sexual Devolution’s Berlin Wall of lies was torn down.

                    This article was originally published at The New American.

Comments

[Jane]

Democrats are really pedophiles. If they can't kill them in the womb they want to have sex with them

[GSH]

The subject matter makes a lot of people squeamish, so they just cover their ears and eyes. Also, people who do talk about it have been branded as "conspiracy theorists", or prudes, or whatever else can be used to turn THEM into the villains for "persecuting" the poor predators. What I have begun to find disturbing is not just that these alleged studies have been used to shape policy and sentencing guidelines, but that there are so many people in our justice system who seem to be actively seeking justification to normalize the exploitation of children.

You mentioned communism near the bottom of this article. I've just re-read "State and Revolution" by Vladimir Lenin, and it reminded me of how open they are about their intentions and methods in their books, because they know that most people simply will not read deeply enough to believe it. Revolutions have always used language and sexual deviancy as tools to separate society, and to make it easy to identify those who are part of the revolution and those who are not. People who refuse to accept the use of bizarre pronouns are immediately "them", as are people who cling to bourgeois notions of sexuality. The Weathermen, back in the 60's claimed that group sex and "smash monogamy" would abolish private property, and break down barriers to their socialist utopia. These things are very much related. There are deviants who come along for the ride, and committed revolutionaries who see their deviance as a necessary tool for the revolution.